The Informal Economy Debate: Four Dominant Schools of Thought
Dualist School:
ILO World Employment Mission Kenya 1972
- characterization of informal activities:
- autonomous activities with few (if any) links with the rest of the economy
- 7 widely-cited features:
- ease of entry
- reliance on indigenous resources
- family ownership of enterprises
- small scale of operations
- labour-intensive and adapted technology
- skills acquired outside the formal school system
- unregulated and competitive markets
- causal theory: exclusion from modern economic opportunities due to two imbalances – between:
- growth of population + growth of modern industrial employment
- people’s skills + structure of modern economic opportunities
Structuralist School:
Manuel Castells and Alejandro Portes 1989
- focus: relationships of production
- characterization of informal economy = specific form of relationships of production + unregulated by the institutions of society
- universal
- heterogeneous
- on the rise
- systemically linked to capitalist/formal firms
- composition of informal economy = self-employed + wage employed
- petty artisans
- petty traders
- sub-contracted workers
- casual laborers
- informalized (i.e., once formal) wage workers
- causal theory: informality due to nature of capitalism/capitalist growth -
- attempts by formal firms to
- reduce labor costs
- increase competitiveness
- reaction of formal firms to:
- power of organized labor
- state regulation of the economy, notably taxes + social legislation
- global competition
- process of industrialization: notably, off-shore industries + sub-contracting chains + flexible specialization
Legalist School:
Hernando De Soto 1989
- focus: rural-to-urban migrants in Lima, Peru
- causal theory: hostile reception, especially from the legal system, leads to
- informal activities
- extralegal norms
- costs of formalization:
- costs of becoming formal: registration + license
- costs of remaining formal: taxes + compliance with regulations/laws + higher rates for public utilities
- costs of informality:
- costs of illegality: to economy of…
- avoidance of fees and penalties
- avoidance of taxes and labour laws
- costs of absence of good law: to informal workers
- not having property rights
- not having enforceable contracts
- not receiving benefits from formal sector
Voluntarist School:
William Maloney 2004
- focus: self-employed, notably micro-entrepreneurs + especially male micro-entrepreneurs
- causal theory: informal sector is “voluntary”: i.e., micro-entrepreneurs choose to operate informally – after weighing costs-benefits of formality vs. informality
- costs of formality: payroll taxes and social protection contributions
- benefits of informality: way to earn income while avoiding costs of formality